Filed: Mar. 04, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6866 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHARLES RICHARD EDWARDS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:01-cr-00099-JCC-1) Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 4, 2009 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Ri
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6866 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHARLES RICHARD EDWARDS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:01-cr-00099-JCC-1) Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 4, 2009 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Ric..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6866
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHARLES RICHARD EDWARDS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:01-cr-00099-JCC-1)
Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 4, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Richard Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. James L. Trump,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Charles Richard Edwards appeals the district court’s
order granting his motion for reduction in sentence of
imprisonment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, United
States v. Edwards, No. 1:01-cr-00099-JCC-1 (E.D. Va. May 6,
2008), and for the reasons expressed in our recent decision in
United States v. Dunphy,
551 F.3d 247, 253-56 (4th Cir. 2009).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2