Filed: Mar. 20, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7120 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WENLEY MCCLAREN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:90-cr-00007-JPB-1) Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 20, 2009 Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brian Christopher C
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7120 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WENLEY MCCLAREN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:90-cr-00007-JPB-1) Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 20, 2009 Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brian Christopher Cr..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7120
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WENLEY MCCLAREN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey,
Chief District Judge. (3:90-cr-00007-JPB-1)
Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 20, 2009
Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brian Christopher Crockett, Assistant Federal Public Defender,
Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. Paul Thomas
Camilletti, Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States
Attorneys, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Wenley McClaren appeals the district court’s order
granting in part and denying in part his motion for reduction of
sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm.
United States v. McClaren, No. 3:90-cr-00007-JPB-1 (N.D.W. Va.
June 30, 2008); see United States v. Dunphy,
551 F.3d 247 (4th
Cir. 2009). We further deny McClaren’s motion to appoint
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2