Filed: Mar. 18, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6665 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DENITRA CARMITA LEWIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (5:06-cr-00057-gec-jgw-4) Submitted: February 18, 2009 Decided: March 18, 2009 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Denitra Carmita L
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6665 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DENITRA CARMITA LEWIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (5:06-cr-00057-gec-jgw-4) Submitted: February 18, 2009 Decided: March 18, 2009 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Denitra Carmita Le..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6665 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DENITRA CARMITA LEWIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (5:06-cr-00057-gec-jgw-4) Submitted: February 18, 2009 Decided: March 18, 2009 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Denitra Carmita Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Albert Lustig, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Denitra Carmita Lewis appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lewis, No. 5:06- cr-00057-gec-jgw-4 (W.D. Va. Mar. 12, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
