Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Redd, 08-7554 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-7554 Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 17, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7554 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DERRICK VINCENT REDD, Defendant - Appellant. No. 08-7555 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DERRICK VINCENT REDD, Defendant – Appellant. No. 08-7642 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DERRICK VINCENT REDD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. C
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7554 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DERRICK VINCENT REDD, Defendant - Appellant. No. 08-7555 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DERRICK VINCENT REDD, Defendant – Appellant. No. 08-7642 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DERRICK VINCENT REDD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:97-cr-00006-JCC-1) Submitted: February 25, 2009 Decided: March 17, 2009 Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Derrick Vincent Redd, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Derrick Vincent Redd appeals district court orders denying his post-conviction motions for grand jury transcripts, the grand jury concurrence form and a copy of the form recording the examination done on the firearm. We affirm. Redd failed to show any particularized need for any of the documents. Accordingly, we affirm the district court orders. We deny his motions for a copy of the transcript at Government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer