Filed: Mar. 24, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8450 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. REGINALD LEON EDWARDS, a/k/a Reginald L. Edwards, Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (6:07-cr-00014-nkm-l) Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 24, 2009 Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Regin
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8450 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. REGINALD LEON EDWARDS, a/k/a Reginald L. Edwards, Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (6:07-cr-00014-nkm-l) Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 24, 2009 Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Regina..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8450 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. REGINALD LEON EDWARDS, a/k/a Reginald L. Edwards, Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (6:07-cr-00014-nkm-l) Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 24, 2009 Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reginald Leon Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Reginald Leon Edwards appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the order granting Edwards’ § 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for modification of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Therefore we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Edwards, No. 6:07-cr- 00014-nkm-1 (W.D. Va. Nov. 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
