Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ferguson v. Constellation Energy Group, Inc., 08-2327 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-2327 Visitors: 15
Filed: Apr. 20, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-2327 MARTY R. FERGUSON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CONSTELLATION ENERGY GROUP, INC.; ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS INCORPORATED AND AFFILIATES; STATE OF MARYLAND; FRANK A. CAHN AND ASSOCIATES; BGE HOME PRODUCTS AND SERVICES; BRYANT FERGUSON; WILLIE MAY FERGUSON; LABOR READY, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judg
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-2327 MARTY R. FERGUSON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CONSTELLATION ENERGY GROUP, INC.; ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS INCORPORATED AND AFFILIATES; STATE OF MARYLAND; FRANK A. CAHN AND ASSOCIATES; BGE HOME PRODUCTS AND SERVICES; BRYANT FERGUSON; WILLIE MAY FERGUSON; LABOR READY, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00274-RDB) Submitted: April 8, 2009 Decided: April 20, 2009 Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marty R. Ferguson, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara A. Gaughan, CONSTELLATION ENERGY GROUP, Baltimore, Maryland; Robert M. Gittins, William John Hickey, Rockville, Maryland; Charles J. Butler, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Frank B. Cahn, III, LAW OFFICE OF FRANK B. CAHN, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Marty R. Ferguson appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for appointment of counsel and dismissing his civil complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ferguson v. Constellation Energy Group, Inc., No. 1:08- cv-00274-RDB (D. Md. Nov. 12, 2008; Nov. 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer