Filed: Apr. 30, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8075 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. VINCENT L. BERNABELA, a/k/a Wink, a/k/a Shaun Robinson, a/k/a Lee Alvin Sampson, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:01-cr-00148-FDW-4) Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: April 30, 2009 Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affir
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8075 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. VINCENT L. BERNABELA, a/k/a Wink, a/k/a Shaun Robinson, a/k/a Lee Alvin Sampson, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:01-cr-00148-FDW-4) Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: April 30, 2009 Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirm..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8075
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
VINCENT L. BERNABELA, a/k/a Wink, a/k/a Shaun Robinson, a/k/a
Lee Alvin Sampson,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,
District Judge. (3:01-cr-00148-FDW-4)
Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: April 30, 2009
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vincent L. Bernabela, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Vincent L. Bernabela appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). Bernabela’s contentions that the
court could have considered a sentence below the amended
guidelines range and that he was entitled to a full resentencing
hearing under United States v. Booker,
543 U.S. 220 (2005), are
foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Dunphy,
551 F.3d
247 (4th Cir. 2009), petition for cert. filed, ___ U.S.L.W. ___
(U.S. Mar. 20, 2009) (No. 08-1185). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
decision of the district court. We deny Bernabela’s motion for
appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2