Filed: Apr. 30, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8417 COREY COLES, Petitioner - Appellant, v. D. B. EVERETT; JOHN JABE; GENE JOHNSON, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:08-cv-00225-RGD-FBS) Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 30, 2009 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Corey Co
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8417 COREY COLES, Petitioner - Appellant, v. D. B. EVERETT; JOHN JABE; GENE JOHNSON, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:08-cv-00225-RGD-FBS) Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 30, 2009 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Corey Col..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8417 COREY COLES, Petitioner - Appellant, v. D. B. EVERETT; JOHN JABE; GENE JOHNSON, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:08-cv-00225-RGD-FBS) Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 30, 2009 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Corey Coles, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Corey Coles appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice Coles’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition for failure to comply with an order of the court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Coles’s motions for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Coles v. Everett, No. 2:08-cv-00225-RGD-FBS (E.D. Va. Oct. 22, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
