Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Pniewski v. Martorella, 08-2112 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-2112 Visitors: 29
Filed: Apr. 29, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-2112 JOSEPH P. PNIEWSKI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARJORIE MARTORELLA, individually and in her official capacity as special prosecutor of Wayne County; WAYNE COUNTY COMMISSION; WEST VIRGINIA PROSECUTING ATTORNEYS, a state agency, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:04-cv-00354) Submitted: April
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-2112 JOSEPH P. PNIEWSKI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARJORIE MARTORELLA, individually and in her official capacity as special prosecutor of Wayne County; WAYNE COUNTY COMMISSION; WEST VIRGINIA PROSECUTING ATTORNEYS, a state agency, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:04-cv-00354) Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: April 29, 2009 Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph P. Pniewski, Appellant Pro Se. Cheryl Lynne Connelly, CAMPBELL WOODS, PLLC, Huntington, West Virginia; Steven Kenneth Nord, OFFUTT NORD, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Joseph P. Pniewski appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pniewski v. Martorella, No. 3:04-cv-00354 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 25, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer