Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Corbin v. Astrue, 08-2353 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-2353 Visitors: 49
Filed: Apr. 29, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-2353 DAVID R. CORBIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Social Security Commissioner; ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General; GAIL WILLIS, Ms., Social Security Administration; SCOTT USSERY, Mr., Attorney of Law; JUNE KOENING, Ms., Bladen County Child Support, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judg
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-2353 DAVID R. CORBIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Social Security Commissioner; ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General; GAIL WILLIS, Ms., Social Security Administration; SCOTT USSERY, Mr., Attorney of Law; JUNE KOENING, Ms., Bladen County Child Support, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:08-cv-00096-BO) Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: April 29, 2009 Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. * Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David R. Corbin, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. * The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (2006). PER CURIAM: David R. Corbin appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing as frivolous Corbin’s civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Corbin’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court. Corbin v. Astrue, No. 5:08-cv- 00096-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 12, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer