Filed: May 04, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8570 DAVID M. KISSI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BUD MITCHLER; HUGH G. HARDESTY, JR.; JOSEPH B. HARDESTY; MORGAN INVESTMENTS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:08-cv-01639-PJM) Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: May 4, 2009 Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8570 DAVID M. KISSI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BUD MITCHLER; HUGH G. HARDESTY, JR.; JOSEPH B. HARDESTY; MORGAN INVESTMENTS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:08-cv-01639-PJM) Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: May 4, 2009 Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8570
DAVID M. KISSI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BUD MITCHLER; HUGH G. HARDESTY, JR.; JOSEPH B. HARDESTY;
MORGAN INVESTMENTS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:08-cv-01639-PJM)
Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: May 4, 2009
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David M. Kissi, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David M. Kissi appeals from the district court’s order
requiring him to pay a partial filing fee in accordance with 28
U.S.C. § 1915(L)(1)(A) (2006). This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006),
and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Kissi seeks to
appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory
or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Kissi’s motion for
appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2