Filed: May 12, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6723 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DERRICK EDWARD BROWN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:03-cr-00534-CMH-1) Submitted: April 27, 2009 Decided: May 12, 2009 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Derrick Edward Brown,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6723 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DERRICK EDWARD BROWN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:03-cr-00534-CMH-1) Submitted: April 27, 2009 Decided: May 12, 2009 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Derrick Edward Brown, A..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6723
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DERRICK EDWARD BROWN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:03-cr-00534-CMH-1)
Submitted: April 27, 2009 Decided: May 12, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derrick Edward Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Kelli Hamby Ferry,
Jeanine Linehan, Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Derrick Edward Brown appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for
reduction of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. See United States v. Dunphy,
551 F.3d 247
(4th Cir. 2009); United States v. Hood,
556 F.3d 226 (4th Cir.
2009). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons set forth by the
district court. United States v. Brown, No. 1:03-cr-00534-CMH-1
(E.D. Va. Apr. 11, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2