Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jones v. Virginia Dept of Social Services, 08-2277 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-2277 Visitors: 8
Filed: May 12, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-2277 DIONNE R. JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00166-TSE-TRJ) Submitted: April 24, 2009 Decided: May 12, 2009 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dionne R. Jone
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-2277 DIONNE R. JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00166-TSE-TRJ) Submitted: April 24, 2009 Decided: May 12, 2009 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dionne R. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Sydney Edmund Rab, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dionne R. Jones appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for the Defendant and the order granting in part and denying in part her motion to reconsider that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order granting summary judgment for the Defendant and the order granting in part and denying in part reconsideration for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Va. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., No. 1:08-cv-00166-TSE-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 10, 2008 & entered Sept. 11, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer