Filed: Jul. 02, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6301 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SHERIF SAFWAT EZZAT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:05-cr-00336-GBL-1) Submitted: June 15, 2009 Decided: July 2, 2009 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael S. Nachmanoff, Federal
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6301 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SHERIF SAFWAT EZZAT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:05-cr-00336-GBL-1) Submitted: June 15, 2009 Decided: July 2, 2009 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael S. Nachmanoff, Federal P..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6301
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
SHERIF SAFWAT EZZAT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:05-cr-00336-GBL-1)
Submitted: June 15, 2009 Decided: July 2, 2009
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael S. Nachmanoff, Federal Public Defender, Darren J.
Johnson, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, Acting United States
Attorney, Lawrence J. Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney,
Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Sherif Safwat Ezzat appeals the district court’s order
granting his motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. §
3582(c)(2) (2006), but denying his request for a reduction below
the range of imprisonment suggested by the reconfigured
guidelines as a result of Amendment 706 to the Sentencing
Guidelines. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual, App. C.
Amend. 706. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm based on our recent decision in
United States v. Dunphy,
551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir. 2009). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2