Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

McClary v. Fowlkes, 08-8078 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-8078 Visitors: 31
Filed: Jul. 02, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8078 JOSHUA BRENT MCCLARY, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. FOWLKES, Mrs., Nurse; CLARK, Mrs., Doctor; C. D. DAVIS, Capt.; J. MERRITT, Lt.; W. BEST, Defendants – Appellees, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Party-in-Interest – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:07-cv-01080-LO-TCB) Submitted: June 8, 2009 Decided: Jul
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8078 JOSHUA BRENT MCCLARY, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. FOWLKES, Mrs., Nurse; CLARK, Mrs., Doctor; C. D. DAVIS, Capt.; J. MERRITT, Lt.; W. BEST, Defendants – Appellees, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Party-in-Interest – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:07-cv-01080-LO-TCB) Submitted: June 8, 2009 Decided: July 2, 2009 Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joshua Brent McClary, Appellant Pro Se. William Wayne Muse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; John Otto Easton, Virginia Margaret Sadler, JORDAN, COYNE & SAVITS, LLP, Fairfax, Virginia; Lisa Ehrich, Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Joshua Brent McClary appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ summary judgment motions on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims against them. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. McClary v. Fowlkes, No. 1:07-cv- 01080-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 27, 2008; entered Aug. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer