Filed: Jul. 08, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1893 LISA COHEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Barry R. Poretz, Magistrate Judge. (1:07-cv-00984-BRP) Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: July 8, 2009 Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpubl
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1893 LISA COHEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Barry R. Poretz, Magistrate Judge. (1:07-cv-00984-BRP) Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: July 8, 2009 Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpubli..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1893
LISA COHEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security
Administration,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Barry R. Poretz,
Magistrate Judge. (1:07-cv-00984-BRP)
Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: July 8, 2009
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bruce K. Billman, Fredericksburg, Virginia, for Appellant. Dana
J. Boente, Acting United States Attorney, Leslie B. McClendon,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lisa Cohen appeals the magistrate judge’s order
affirming the Commissioner’s decision to deny Cohen a period of
disability and disability insurance benefits. * We must uphold
the decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported by
substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. See 42
U.S.C.A. § 405(g) (West Supp. 2008); Craig v. Chater,
76 F.3d
585, 589 (4th Cir. 1996). We have thoroughly reviewed the
parties’ briefs, administrative record, and the materials
submitted in the joint appendix, and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm. See Cohen v. Astrue, No. 1:07-cv-00984-
BRP (E.D. Va. filed June 11, 2008; entered June 12, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).
2