Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Washington v. US Department of Defense, 08-1880 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-1880 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 07, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1880 CAROLYN L. WASHINGTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Defense Logistics Agency, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cv-00482-RLW) Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: July 7, 2009 Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1880 CAROLYN L. WASHINGTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Defense Logistics Agency, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cv-00482-RLW) Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: July 7, 2009 Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Scott G. Crowley, Sr., CROWLEY & CROWLEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, Acting United States Attorney, Debra J. Prillaman, Assistant United States Attorney, Daniel L. Freye, OFFICE OF COUNSEL, DEFENSE SUPPLY CENTER RICHMOND, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Carolyn L. Washington appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Washington v. United States Dep’t of Defense, No. 3:07-cv-00482-RLW (E.D. Va. July 11, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer