Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Davis v. Warden, 08-7683 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-7683 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 21, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7683 MARLIN DAVIS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN, Federal Correctional Institution at Estill, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (3:07-cv-00606-HFF) Submitted: June 30, 2009 Decided: July 21, 2009 Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7683 MARLIN DAVIS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN, Federal Correctional Institution at Estill, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (3:07-cv-00606-HFF) Submitted: June 30, 2009 Decided: July 21, 2009 Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marlin Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Marlin Davis, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. Davis also appeals the district court’s order summarily denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Davis v. Warden, No. 3:07-cv-00606- HFF (D.S.C. filed Feb. 12, 2008 & entered Feb. 13, 2008; July 31, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer