Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Dula v. National Security Agency, 08-2352 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-2352 Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 24, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-2352 GARY DUEY DULA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY; ITT CORPORATION; NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:08-cv-00427-DKC) Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 24, 2009 Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Aff
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-2352 GARY DUEY DULA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY; ITT CORPORATION; NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:08-cv-00427-DKC) Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 24, 2009 Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary Duey Dula, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Patrick Grady, Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorneys, Baltimore, Maryland; Adam Harrison Garner, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Aniya M. Dunkley, Charys Scotton Williams, MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Gary Duey Dula appeals the district court’s order dismissing Dula’s complaint and denying him injunctive and mandamus relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dula v. Nat’l Sec. Agency, No. 8:08-cv- 00427-DKC (D. Md. Nov. 4, 2008). We deny Dula’s motions for mandamus and general relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer