Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Wheeler v. Lappin, 09-7121 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 09-7121 Visitors: 27
Filed: Oct. 21, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7121 QUINTON WHEELER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director; JOE DRIVER, Warden; JEFF BOYLES, Medical Administrator; JORGES VAZQUEZ, Medical Doctor; A. PELLOTHEODOROS, Correction Officer, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00206-IMK-JSK) Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: Oc
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7121 QUINTON WHEELER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director; JOE DRIVER, Warden; JEFF BOYLES, Medical Administrator; JORGES VAZQUEZ, Medical Doctor; A. PELLOTHEODOROS, Correction Officer, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00206-IMK-JSK) Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 21, 2009 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Quinton Wheeler, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Quinton Wheeler appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, denying his motion for preliminary injunction, and denying his motion to supplement his claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wheeler v. Lappin, No. 1:08-cv-00206-IMK-JSK (N.D.W. Va. June 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer