Filed: Oct. 21, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1156 T. SCOTT CARTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GATEWAY BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00634-RLW) Submitted: October 9, 2009 Decided: October 21, 2009 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam o
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1156 T. SCOTT CARTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GATEWAY BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00634-RLW) Submitted: October 9, 2009 Decided: October 21, 2009 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam op..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1156 T. SCOTT CARTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GATEWAY BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00634-RLW) Submitted: October 9, 2009 Decided: October 21, 2009 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph E. Blackburn, Jr., BLACKBURN, CONTE, SCHILLING & CLICK, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Heath H. Galloway, WILLIAMS MULLEN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: T. Scott Carter appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the district court’s dismissal of his breach of contract suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carter v. Gateway Bank & Trust Co., No. 3:08-cv-00634-RLW (E.D. Va. Jan. 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
