Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Harrison v. Bingo Old Solomon Kitchen, 09-1717 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 09-1717 Visitors: 53
Filed: Oct. 19, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1717 EUGENE PAUL HARRISON, a/k/a Eugene P. Harrison, a/k/a Eugene Paul Harrison, Sr., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. BINGO OLD SOLOMON KITCHEN; JAMES FELDER, Owner; ROCHELLE HEYWARD, Manager, Defendants – Appellees, and JESSE FOSTER, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (3:08-cv-02651-PMD) Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decide
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1717 EUGENE PAUL HARRISON, a/k/a Eugene P. Harrison, a/k/a Eugene Paul Harrison, Sr., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. BINGO OLD SOLOMON KITCHEN; JAMES FELDER, Owner; ROCHELLE HEYWARD, Manager, Defendants – Appellees, and JESSE FOSTER, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (3:08-cv-02651-PMD) Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 19, 2009 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eugene Paul Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. James Felder; Rochelle Heyward, Appellees Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Eugene Paul Harrison appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to the Defendants in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harrison v. Bingo Old Solomon Kitchen, No. 3:08-cv- 02651-PMD (D.S.C. June 19, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer