Filed: Nov. 03, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6336 DARRELL J. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SERGEANT JACKSON, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center; WARDEN, ALVIN S. GLENN DETENTION CENTER, a/k/a Renaldo Meyers, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (8:07-cv-03661-CMC) Submitted: September 18, 2009 Decided: November 3, 20
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6336 DARRELL J. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SERGEANT JACKSON, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center; WARDEN, ALVIN S. GLENN DETENTION CENTER, a/k/a Renaldo Meyers, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (8:07-cv-03661-CMC) Submitted: September 18, 2009 Decided: November 3, 200..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6336 DARRELL J. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SERGEANT JACKSON, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center; WARDEN, ALVIN S. GLENN DETENTION CENTER, a/k/a Renaldo Meyers, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (8:07-cv-03661-CMC) Submitted: September 18, 2009 Decided: November 3, 2009 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Darrell J. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel C. Plyler, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Darrell J. Williams appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Jackson, No. 8:07-cv-03661-CMC (D.S.C. Feb. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2