Filed: Nov. 19, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7939 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TRACY LYNN PETTY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:04-cr-00250-RJC-CH-5) Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 19, 2009 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Trac
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7939 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TRACY LYNN PETTY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:04-cr-00250-RJC-CH-5) Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 19, 2009 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tracy..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7939 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TRACY LYNN PETTY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:04-cr-00250-RJC-CH-5) Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 19, 2009 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tracy Lynn Petty, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Tracy Lynn Petty appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We find no reversible error and we thus affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Petty, No. 3:04-cr-00250- RJC-CH-5 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 27, 2008). We deny Petty’s motion for appointment of counsel, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
