Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hilgeford v. American International Group, Inc., 09-1828 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 09-1828 Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 19, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1828 MATTHEW J. HILGEFORD, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INCORPORATED; NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA; AIG DOMESTIC CLAIMS, INCORPORATED a/k/a AIG Claim Services, Incorporated; BANK OF AMERICA N.A., (National Association), Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1828 MATTHEW J. HILGEFORD, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INCORPORATED; NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA; AIG DOMESTIC CLAIMS, INCORPORATED a/k/a AIG Claim Services, Incorporated; BANK OF AMERICA N.A., (National Association), Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:09-cv-00440-JRS) Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 19, 2009 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Matthew J. Hilgeford, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Barnes Delano, Jr., SANDS, ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Matthew J. Hilgeford, who proceeds in forma pauperis, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action against Defendants under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Hilgeford v. Am. Int’l Group, Inc., No. 3:09-cv-00440-JRS (E.D. Va. July 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer