Filed: Nov. 25, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7605 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CLINTON BERNARD FRAZIER-EL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:96-cr-00469-WMN-1) Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 25, 2009 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clinton Ber
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7605 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CLINTON BERNARD FRAZIER-EL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:96-cr-00469-WMN-1) Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 25, 2009 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clinton Bern..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7605 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CLINTON BERNARD FRAZIER-EL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:96-cr-00469-WMN-1) Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 25, 2009 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clinton Bernard Frazier-El, Appellant Pro Se. Lynn Ann Battaglia, MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS, Annapolis, Maryland; Jamie M. Bennett, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Clinton Bernard Frazier-El appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a downward departure. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Frazier-El, No. 1:96-cr-00469-WMN-1 (D. Md. Aug. 13, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
