Filed: Nov. 24, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7318 LEE O. WILSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GENE JOHNSON, Director of Department of Corrections; DORIS EWING, Court and Legal Supervisor; EDWARD MEEKS, Superintendent Cold Springs Work Center, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:07-cv-00165-LMB-JFA) Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: Novembe
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7318 LEE O. WILSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GENE JOHNSON, Director of Department of Corrections; DORIS EWING, Court and Legal Supervisor; EDWARD MEEKS, Superintendent Cold Springs Work Center, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:07-cv-00165-LMB-JFA) Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7318
LEE O. WILSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GENE JOHNSON, Director of Department of Corrections; DORIS
EWING, Court and Legal Supervisor; EDWARD MEEKS,
Superintendent Cold Springs Work Center,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:07-cv-00165-LMB-JFA)
Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 24, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lee O. Wilson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lee O. Wilson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district
court’s order denying his motion for appointment of counsel.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order
Wilson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2