Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Brown v. Patrick, 09-7157 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 09-7157 Visitors: 75
Filed: Nov. 23, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7157 JEVON EDWARD BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PATRICK, Virginia Department of Corrections Officer, C/O, employee for Unit #27; MR. RAGSDALE, Virginia Department of Transportation, Foreman, Crew Virginia; MS. FRANCHER, Virginia Department of Corrections, Unit #27, Medical Care Assistant/Personnel; R. GRAMMER, Virginia Department of Corrections, Unit #27, former inmate; J. H. SNODGRASS; A. HARRIS, Defendants - Appellees.
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7157 JEVON EDWARD BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PATRICK, Virginia Department of Corrections Officer, C/O, employee for Unit #27; MR. RAGSDALE, Virginia Department of Transportation, Foreman, Crew Virginia; MS. FRANCHER, Virginia Department of Corrections, Unit #27, Medical Care Assistant/Personnel; R. GRAMMER, Virginia Department of Corrections, Unit #27, former inmate; J. H. SNODGRASS; A. HARRIS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-01345-TSE-TRJ) Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 23, 2009 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jevon Edward Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jevon Edward Brown appeals the district court’s order denying what it construed to be a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s February 24, 2009 order dismissing Brown’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action against Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Patrick, 1:08-cv-01345-TSE-TRJ (E.D. Va. Apr. 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer