Filed: Dec. 08, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-5106 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RICHARD HENRY ROBINSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cr-00076-CMH-1) Submitted: August 27, 2009 Decided: December 8, 2009 Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael S. Nachman
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-5106 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RICHARD HENRY ROBINSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cr-00076-CMH-1) Submitted: August 27, 2009 Decided: December 8, 2009 Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael S. Nachmano..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-5106
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RICHARD HENRY ROBINSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:08-cr-00076-CMH-1)
Submitted: August 27, 2009 Decided: December 8, 2009
Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael S. Nachmanoff, Federal Public Defender, Whitney E. C.
Minter, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Alexandria, Virginia,
for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, Acting United States Attorney,
Andrew McCormack, Special Assistant United States Attorney,
Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Richard Henry Robinson appeals the district court’s
judgment entered pursuant to his guilty plea to failure to
register as a sex offender, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250
(2006). Robinson reserved, in his plea agreement, the right to
challenge on appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to
dismiss the indictment against him. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error in light of this court’s recent
authoritative decision in United States v. Gould,
568 F.3d 459
(4th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
in Gould. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2