Filed: Dec. 07, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2035 In Re: GARY LEWIS MILLER-EL, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Submitted: November 16, 2009 Decided: December 7, 2009 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary Lewis Miller-El, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Gary Lewis Miller-El petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order co
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2035 In Re: GARY LEWIS MILLER-EL, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Submitted: November 16, 2009 Decided: December 7, 2009 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary Lewis Miller-El, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Gary Lewis Miller-El petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order com..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2035
In Re: GARY LEWIS MILLER-EL,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
Submitted: November 16, 2009 Decided: December 7, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary Lewis Miller-El, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Gary Lewis Miller-El petitions for a writ of mandamus
seeking an order compelling state officials to dismiss a pending
indictment and release him from custody, and other remedies. We
conclude that Miller-El is not entitled to mandamus relief.
Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used
only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States
Dist. Court,
426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v.
Moussaoui,
333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further,
mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a
clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan
Ass'n,
860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). This court does not
have jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against state
officials. Gurley v. Superior Court of Mecklenburg County,
411
F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969).
The relief sought by Miller-El is not available by way
of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of
mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
2