Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Pendleton, 09-7968 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 09-7968 Visitors: 30
Filed: Jan. 22, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7968 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RICKY VINCENT PENDLETON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:96-cr-00001-FPS-JES-1) Submitted: January 14, 2010 Decided: January 22, 2010 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinio
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7968 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RICKY VINCENT PENDLETON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:96-cr-00001-FPS-JES-1) Submitted: January 14, 2010 Decided: January 22, 2010 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ricky Vincent Pendleton, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ricky Vincent Pendleton appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Pendleton’s petition for a writ of error coram nobis as unintelligible and for failure to raise any cognizable claim for relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Pendleton’s motion for transcripts at government expense and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Pendleton, No. 3:96-cr-00001- FPS-JES-1 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 7, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer