Filed: Jan. 22, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1334 PERRY BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF MARYLAND; DEPUTY PATRICK H. HANDY, Defendants – Appellees, and JOHN DOE, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:07-cv-01956-PJM) Submitted: January 8, 2010 Decided: January 22, 2010 Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1334 PERRY BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF MARYLAND; DEPUTY PATRICK H. HANDY, Defendants – Appellees, and JOHN DOE, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:07-cv-01956-PJM) Submitted: January 8, 2010 Decided: January 22, 2010 Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by u..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1334 PERRY BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF MARYLAND; DEPUTY PATRICK H. HANDY, Defendants – Appellees, and JOHN DOE, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:07-cv-01956-PJM) Submitted: January 8, 2010 Decided: January 22, 2010 Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Perry Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Corlie McCormick, Jr., David Reid Moore, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Perry Brown appeals the district court’s final order of judgment entered after a jury returned a defense verdict in Brown’s civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Brown v. Maryland, No. 8:07-cv-01956-PJM (D. Md. Feb. 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
