Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Kinney v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, 09-2231 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 09-2231 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 26, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2231 DARRYL KINNEY; JK MINOR, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE; I.R.S.; STATE OF ILLINOIS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-00806-CMH-TCB) Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 26, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2231 DARRYL KINNEY; JK MINOR, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE; I.R.S.; STATE OF ILLINOIS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-00806-CMH-TCB) Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 26, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Darryl Kinney, JK Minor, Appellants Pro Se. Kevin J. Mikolashek, Lauren Anne Wetzler, Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Darryl Kinney and JK Minor appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil rights action as frivolous. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellants’ brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b), and Appellants’ brief alleges no error committed by the district court. We therefore find Appellants have forfeited appellate review of that order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Further, we grant Appellants’ motion to withdraw their previously filed motion for default judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer