Filed: Aug. 06, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1396 PATRICIA A. EADDY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Thomas M. DiGirolamo, Magistrate Judge. (8:11-cv-02307-TMD) Submitted: July 26, 2013 Decided: August 6, 2013 Before AGEE and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per cu
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1396 PATRICIA A. EADDY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Thomas M. DiGirolamo, Magistrate Judge. (8:11-cv-02307-TMD) Submitted: July 26, 2013 Decided: August 6, 2013 Before AGEE and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per cur..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1396 PATRICIA A. EADDY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Thomas M. DiGirolamo, Magistrate Judge. (8:11-cv-02307-TMD) Submitted: July 26, 2013 Decided: August 6, 2013 Before AGEE and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patricia A. Eaddy, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Gordon, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Patricia A. Eaddy appeals the district court’s order upholding the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision to reduce her widow’s benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Eaddy v. Astrue, No. 8:11-cv-02307-TMD (D. Md. Jan. 31, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
