Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Valley Camp Coal Company v. Fenton Hill, 13-1108 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 13-1108 Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 08, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1108 VALLEY CAMP COAL COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FENTON HILL; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (12-0112-BLA) Submitted: July 26, 2013 Decided: August 8, 2013 Before AGEE, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. William S. Mattingly, Christopher M. Gre
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1108 VALLEY CAMP COAL COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FENTON HILL; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (12-0112-BLA) Submitted: July 26, 2013 Decided: August 8, 2013 Before AGEE, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. William S. Mattingly, Christopher M. Green, JACKSON KELLY PLLC, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Petitioner. Sandra M. Fogel, CULLEY & WISSORE, Carbondale, Illinois, for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Valley Camp Coal Company seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2006). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Valley Camp Coal Co. v. Hill, No. 12-0112-BLA (B.R.B. Nov. 26, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer