Filed: Aug. 14, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6831 JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BROWN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; STEPHANIE BECKETT, Land Records Sup., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:13-cv-01277-ELH) Submitted: July 19, 2013 Decided: August 14, 2013 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per cu
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6831 JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BROWN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; STEPHANIE BECKETT, Land Records Sup., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:13-cv-01277-ELH) Submitted: July 19, 2013 Decided: August 14, 2013 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per cur..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6831 JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BROWN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; STEPHANIE BECKETT, Land Records Sup., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:13-cv-01277-ELH) Submitted: July 19, 2013 Decided: August 14, 2013 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v. Brown Cnty. Circuit Court, No. 1:13-cv-01277-ELH (D. Md. filed May 1, 2013; entered May 2, 2013). We grant Brown leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
