Filed: Aug. 23, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1257 JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RICHARD D. FAIRBANK, Capital One Bank, CEO, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Ivan Darnell Davis, Magistrate Judge. (1:12-mc-00028-CMH-IDD) Submitted: August 9, 2013 Decided: August 23, 2013 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam op
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1257 JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RICHARD D. FAIRBANK, Capital One Bank, CEO, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Ivan Darnell Davis, Magistrate Judge. (1:12-mc-00028-CMH-IDD) Submitted: August 9, 2013 Decided: August 23, 2013 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opi..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1257
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RICHARD D. FAIRBANK, Capital One Bank, CEO,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Ivan Darnell Davis,
Magistrate Judge. (1:12-mc-00028-CMH-IDD)
Submitted: August 9, 2013 Decided: August 23, 2013
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. seeks to appeal the
magistrate judge’s order denying his motion. The district court
previously dismissed his proposed complaint without prejudice.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The
order Brown seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we
deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal
for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2