In Re: David Robinson v., 13-1832 (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: 13-1832
Visitors: 63
Filed: Sep. 03, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1832 In re: DAVID MCDOWELL ROBINSON, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:07-cr-00087-RDB-1) Submitted: August 29, 2013 Decided: September 3, 2013 Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. David McDowell Robinson, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: David McDowell Robinson petitions for a writ of
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1832 In re: DAVID MCDOWELL ROBINSON, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:07-cr-00087-RDB-1) Submitted: August 29, 2013 Decided: September 3, 2013 Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. David McDowell Robinson, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: David McDowell Robinson petitions for a writ of ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1832 In re: DAVID MCDOWELL ROBINSON, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:07-cr-00087-RDB-1) Submitted: August 29, 2013 Decided: September 3, 2013 Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. David McDowell Robinson, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: David McDowell Robinson petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed ruling on his motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2
Source: CourtListener
