Filed: Sep. 09, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1321 CLEIDE FERREIRA DE OLIVEIRA, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: August 26, 2013 Decided: September 9, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cleide Ferreira De Oliveira, Petitioner Pro Se. David H. Wetmore, Office of Immigration Litigatio
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1321 CLEIDE FERREIRA DE OLIVEIRA, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: August 26, 2013 Decided: September 9, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cleide Ferreira De Oliveira, Petitioner Pro Se. David H. Wetmore, Office of Immigration Litigation..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1321
CLEIDE FERREIRA DE OLIVEIRA,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: August 26, 2013 Decided: September 9, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cleide Ferreira De Oliveira, Petitioner Pro Se. David H.
Wetmore, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Cleide De Oliveira petitions for review of an order of
the Board of Immigration Appeals denying reconsideration of the
agency’s decision denying the relief of cancellation of removal.
We have reviewed the administrative record and De Oliveira’s
claims and conclude that we lack jurisdiction over the petition
for review. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), (a)(2)(D) (2006);
Sorcia v. Holder,
643 F.3d 117, 124-25 (4th Cir.), cert. denied,
132 S. Ct. 776 (2011). Accordingly, we grant the Attorney
General’s motion to dismiss the petition for review. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED
2