Filed: Sep. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6530 JESSE YARBOROUGH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LIEUTENANT SAPPINGTON; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SEXTON; DR. CLAUDIUS, Defendants – Appellees and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; TYRANE L. MORGAN; M. BAILEY; J. BASKVILLE; MRS. HOSHER; P.A. FALLON, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:09-ct-03083-D) Submitted: Septe
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6530 JESSE YARBOROUGH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LIEUTENANT SAPPINGTON; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SEXTON; DR. CLAUDIUS, Defendants – Appellees and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; TYRANE L. MORGAN; M. BAILEY; J. BASKVILLE; MRS. HOSHER; P.A. FALLON, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:09-ct-03083-D) Submitted: Septem..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6530
JESSE YARBOROUGH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LIEUTENANT SAPPINGTON; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SEXTON; DR.
CLAUDIUS,
Defendants – Appellees
and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; TYRANE L. MORGAN; M. BAILEY; J.
BASKVILLE; MRS. HOSHER; P.A. FALLON,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:09-ct-03083-D)
Submitted: September 24, 2013 Decided: September 26, 2013
Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jesse Yarborough, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Bredenberg, FMC
BUTNER FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER, Butner, North Carolina; Edward D.
Gray, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Following a bench trial on the remaining claims in
Jesse Yarborough’s civil rights action, which was filed pursuant
to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971), the district court entered
judgment in favor of Defendants. We have reviewed Yarborough’s
claims on appeal in conjunction with the record, and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Yarborough v. Sappington, No. 5:09-
ct-03083-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 21, 2013). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3