Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Elbert Simpkins v. Al Cannon, 13-6904 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 13-6904 Visitors: 20
Filed: Sep. 30, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6904 ELBERT SIMPKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SHERIFF AL CANNON; CAPTAIN KEYS; NFN RANDALL; LT JOHNSON, classification dept; CO NFN LOVE; CO NFN VEGAS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:12-cv-01447-GRA) Submitted: September 26, 2013 Decided: September 30, 2013 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYN
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6904 ELBERT SIMPKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SHERIFF AL CANNON; CAPTAIN KEYS; NFN RANDALL; LT JOHNSON, classification dept; CO NFN LOVE; CO NFN VEGAS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:12-cv-01447-GRA) Submitted: September 26, 2013 Decided: September 30, 2013 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elbert Simpkins, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Thomas Dorsel, Sandra J. Senn, SENN LEGAL, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Elbert Simpkins appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Simpkins’ motion for a transcript at government expense and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Simpkins v. Cannon, No. 5:12-cv-01447-GRA (D.S.C. May 28, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer