Filed: May 26, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1121 GEORGE KEATON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. REGINA WOODFORD; ELLEN BULLINGER; ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:09-cv-03485-JFM) Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 26, 2010 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. G
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1121 GEORGE KEATON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. REGINA WOODFORD; ELLEN BULLINGER; ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:09-cv-03485-JFM) Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 26, 2010 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ge..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1121
GEORGE KEATON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
REGINA WOODFORD; ELLEN BULLINGER; ALLSTATE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge.
(1:09-cv-03485-JFM)
Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 26, 2010
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Keaton, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
George Keaton, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint with
pendent state law claims. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Keaton v. Woodford, No. 1:09-cv-
03485-JFM (D. Md. Jan. 11, 2010). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2