Filed: Jun. 04, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7251 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. FERRELL BENJAMIN GIBBS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:03-cr-00609-GRA-1) Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 4, 2010 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ferrell Benjamin Gi
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7251 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. FERRELL BENJAMIN GIBBS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:03-cr-00609-GRA-1) Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 4, 2010 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ferrell Benjamin Gib..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7251 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. FERRELL BENJAMIN GIBBS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:03-cr-00609-GRA-1) Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 4, 2010 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ferrell Benjamin Gibbs, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Frank McDonald, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ferrell Benjamin Gibbs appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motions to recuse the district court judge and to vacate the criminal judgment as void and to terminate supervised release. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the denial of relief was appropriate. Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Gibbs’ motion for a polygraph examination and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
