Filed: Jun. 11, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1392 MELODY EADIE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ANDERSON COUNTY DISABILITIES AND SPECIAL NEEDS BOARD, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (8:07-cv-03406-HMH) Submitted: May 26, 2010 Decided: June 11, 2010 Before KING and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublishe
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1392 MELODY EADIE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ANDERSON COUNTY DISABILITIES AND SPECIAL NEEDS BOARD, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (8:07-cv-03406-HMH) Submitted: May 26, 2010 Decided: June 11, 2010 Before KING and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1392 MELODY EADIE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ANDERSON COUNTY DISABILITIES AND SPECIAL NEEDS BOARD, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (8:07-cv-03406-HMH) Submitted: May 26, 2010 Decided: June 11, 2010 Before KING and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mary C. McCormac, Clemson, South Carolina, for Appellant. James W. Logan, Jr., LOGAN, JOLLY & SMITH, LLP, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Melody Eadie appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for the Appellee and dismissing her employment lawsuit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Eadie v. Anderson County Disabilities & Special Needs Bd., No. 8:07-cv-03406-HMH (D.S.C. Mar. 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
