Filed: Jun. 15, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8362 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CLAUDIO OTERO, JR., a/k/a Bill, Defendant - Appellant. No. 09-7417 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CLAUDIO OTERO, JR., a/k/a Bill, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (6:99-cr-70054-nkm-mfu-6) Submitted: May 27, 2010 Decided: June 15,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8362 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CLAUDIO OTERO, JR., a/k/a Bill, Defendant - Appellant. No. 09-7417 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CLAUDIO OTERO, JR., a/k/a Bill, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (6:99-cr-70054-nkm-mfu-6) Submitted: May 27, 2010 Decided: June 15, 2..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8362
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CLAUDIO OTERO, JR., a/k/a Bill,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 09-7417
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CLAUDIO OTERO, JR., a/k/a Bill,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District
Judge. (6:99-cr-70054-nkm-mfu-6)
Submitted: May 27, 2010 Decided: June 15, 2010
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Claudio Otero, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno,
Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Claudio Otero, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2006) and his motion for reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Otero, No. 6:99-cr-70054-nkm-6 (W.D. Va. Sept. 15,
2008 & July 15, 2009). We deny Otero’s motion for appointment
of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3