Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Snyder v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 09-8044 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 09-8044 Visitors: 43
Filed: Jun. 24, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-8044 RICHARD SNYDER; CATHERINE SNYDER, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP; HARLEY LEWIN; STEPHEN J. WADYKA; JANET SHIH HAJEK; DIANE VON FURSTENBERG, LP, Defendants – Appellees, and DIANE VON FURSTENBERG STUDIO; LARISSA MACFARQUHAR; THE NEW YORKER MAGAZINE, INC.; CONDE NAST, INCORPORATED; ADVANCE PUBLICATIONS, INCORPORATED, trading as The New Yorker, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court fo
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-8044 RICHARD SNYDER; CATHERINE SNYDER, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP; HARLEY LEWIN; STEPHEN J. WADYKA; JANET SHIH HAJEK; DIANE VON FURSTENBERG, LP, Defendants – Appellees, and DIANE VON FURSTENBERG STUDIO; LARISSA MACFARQUHAR; THE NEW YORKER MAGAZINE, INC.; CONDE NAST, INCORPORATED; ADVANCE PUBLICATIONS, INCORPORATED, trading as The New Yorker, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:08-cv-01270-GBL-TCB) Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 24, 2010 Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Snyder, Catherine Snyder, Appellants Pro Se. Thomas Gerard Connolly, Jacinda Ann Lanum, Patrick Pearse O’Donnell, Christopher J. Wright, WILTSHIRE & GRANNIS, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Kevin B. Bedell, GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP, McLean, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Richard and Catherine Snyder appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their civil action and reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Snyder v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP, No. 1:08-cv-01270-GBL-TCB (E.D. Va. Oct. 29, 2009 & Jan. 11, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer