Odom v. Mt. Pleasant Police Department, 10-6312 (2010)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: 10-6312
Visitors: 45
Filed: Aug. 02, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6312 CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM, Plaintiff - Appellant v. MT. PLEASANT POLICE DEPARTMENT INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER; TOWN OF MT. PLEASANT INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER; WAL-MART INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER; CHARLESTON COUNTY JAIL INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OF SOUTH CAROLINA MEDICAL INSURANCE POLICY
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6312 CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM, Plaintiff - Appellant v. MT. PLEASANT POLICE DEPARTMENT INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER; TOWN OF MT. PLEASANT INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER; WAL-MART INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER; CHARLESTON COUNTY JAIL INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OF SOUTH CAROLINA MEDICAL INSURANCE POLICY ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6312
CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM,
Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
MT. PLEASANT POLICE DEPARTMENT INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER;
TOWN OF MT. PLEASANT INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER; WAL-MART
INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER; CHARLESTON COUNTY JAIL INSURANCE
POLICY HOLDER; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA INSURANCE POLICY
HOLDER; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OF SOUTH
CAROLINA MEDICAL INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER; STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA BAR ASSOCIATION INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior
District Judge. (3:09-cv-01941-PMD)
Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: August 2, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher A. Odom, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Christopher A. Odom appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Odom v.
Mt. Pleasant Police Dep’t, No. 3:09-cv-01941-PMD (D.S.C.
Jan. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Source: CourtListener