Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Chadwick-El v. Connor, 10-6339 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 10-6339 Visitors: 60
Filed: Aug. 05, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6339 STEVE CARL CHADWICK-EL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. PATRICIA S. CONNOR, U.S. Court Clerk, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:09-cv-03331-RDB) Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 5, 2010 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ste
More
                             UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                             No. 10-6339


STEVE CARL CHADWICK-EL,

                Plaintiff – Appellant,

          v.

PATRICIA S. CONNOR, U.S. Court Clerk,

                Defendant – Appellee.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.    Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:09-cv-03331-RDB)


Submitted:   July 27, 2010                  Decided:   August 5, 2010


Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit
Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Steve Carl Chadwick-El, Appellant Pro Se.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

            Steve   Carl     Chadwick-El    appeals      the    district     court’s

order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.                     We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.                     Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.                          See

Chadwick-El v. Connor, No. 1:09-cv-03331-RDB (D. Md. Jan. 7,

2010).     We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal    contentions   are     adequately    presented         in   the    materials

before   the   court   and    argument     would   not    aid       the   decisional

process.

                                                                            AFFIRMED




                                      2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer