Filed: Aug. 06, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6460 JASON MITCHELL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; MONONGALIA GENERAL HOSPITAL; ROGER KING; GREENWALD; ANTENELLI; WATSON; BRIMSON; ODDO; KAMICAR; KERN; HAGGERTY, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00195-IMK-JES) Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decide
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6460 JASON MITCHELL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; MONONGALIA GENERAL HOSPITAL; ROGER KING; GREENWALD; ANTENELLI; WATSON; BRIMSON; ODDO; KAMICAR; KERN; HAGGERTY, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00195-IMK-JES) Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6460
JASON MITCHELL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS;
MONONGALIA GENERAL HOSPITAL; ROGER KING; GREENWALD;
ANTENELLI; WATSON; BRIMSON; ODDO; KAMICAR; KERN; HAGGERTY,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley,
District Judge. (1:08-cv-00195-IMK-JES)
Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 6, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jason Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jason Mitchell appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his complaint, which was properly construed as one
filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed.
Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Mitchell v. United
States, No. 1:08-cv-00195-IMK-JES (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 11, 2010).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2