Filed: Aug. 06, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6542 JAMES J. HUNDLEY, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. RONALD REVISH, Probation Officer; AARON SUMPTER, Probation Officer; JOHN DOE, District Supervisor, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00068-LMB-IDD) Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 6, 2010 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and K
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6542 JAMES J. HUNDLEY, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. RONALD REVISH, Probation Officer; AARON SUMPTER, Probation Officer; JOHN DOE, District Supervisor, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00068-LMB-IDD) Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 6, 2010 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KE..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6542
JAMES J. HUNDLEY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
RONALD REVISH, Probation Officer; AARON SUMPTER, Probation
Officer; JOHN DOE, District Supervisor,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:10-cv-00068-LMB-IDD)
Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 6, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James J. Hundley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James J. Hundley appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Hundley v. Revish, No. 1:10-cv-
00068-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 31, 2010; entered Apr. 1,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2